|
DO we have some more broadly
informed, open-minded people to provide balanced information regarding the
pozzolan mining issue? It seems that the people of the CNMI need to hear
details of all aspects of the debate in order to understand each position.
We read about the real risks and concerns of businesses that want to
undertake the mining project. But I also see a fair amount of personal
attack in the papers. Slinging mud is kind of fun and it reveals the
writers’ biases, but I don’t think attacks help the general public
understand the issues that can critically affect their future. As I
understand, Pagan Watch and many others in the CNMI want a larger share of
pozzolan profits to go to the people than is proposed by the Sablan
company. Where are the details of this position? How would that money
benefit the CNMI and what is the assurance that the money would get to
those services that need it? Are the Kaipats, the governor and others
still the brave ones who are speaking out for the people of the CNMI?
I had the honor of living in the CNMI for four months this year while
I worked with special education and CHC programs. I fell in love with the
place and the people. The pozzolan issue intrigued me so I asked Rep.
Cinta M. Kaipat what she hoped could be done with the CNMI share of
revenues. She talked about a new “state of the art” hospital so fewer
patients will have to go off island, major improvements in the quality of
public education and many other things. She also welcomed anyone to make
an appointment to talk with her about her position on the pozzolan project
as well as the history of the Sablan company’s preliminary work to
date. I read an opinion column in which Representative Kaipat’s
motivations were characterized as greed. Greed is the last trait that
would occur to me regarding the Kaipat family as I watched their volunteer
involvement and leadership in one community activity after another while I
was in the CNMI, from the Flame Tree Festival to the Micronesian Games.
They don’t get paid for what they do. Representative Kaipat does not get
paid for her work with students at NMC and the Beautify CNMI! project. As
a public servant she certainly doesn’t earn a fraction of what she could
get as an attorney in private practice. I certainly appreciate a
legitimate challenge to the position of one’s opposition. But “greed” and
Cinta Kaipat don’t fit in the same sentence. I wish that the pozzolan
issue didn’t remind me of mainland U.S. politics: the guys with big money
use scare tactics to quiet the noble opposition. I hope that doesn’t
happen in the CNMI. I wish this issue didn’t remind me of the U.S.
government deals allowing decades of token amounts to be paid by big
mining and lumber companies to lease public lands. These companies make
multi-millions from these mining operations. The citizens of the U.S.
benefit not at all, but they are often left with land forever scarred by
the mining and logging operations. The CNMI has the opportunity to do
better than that. Imagine a win-win collaboration between the people and
the mining company. All could be proud of the improvements in services
that result from nature’s gift to the Northern Mariana
Islands.
NANCY RUSHMER Bellingham,
Washington |